Sierra Mist Lawsuit Exploring The Legal Battle And Its Implications
Pepsico sued cierra mistt, a tiktok influencer, for using her name, claiming trademark infringement. Pepsi in hot water over trademark dispute Cierra claimed victory, but the legal outcome is unclear.
Sierra Mist Lawsuit Exploring the Legal Battle and Its Implications
The case highlights the challenges of online branding and intellectual property rights. The story of the “sierra mist lawsuit” offers valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities faced by major brands. Pepsico rebranded it as starry, a new soda with a different flavor and formula.
Consumers sue pepsico for misleading them about sierra mist's ingredients and health claims.
An influencer alleges to have triggered the rebranding to starry, but faces legal challenges for trademark misunderstandings. Find out how the case affected the beverage industry and consumers, and why sierra mist was replaced by starry. The lawsuit claims that the rebranding violated trademark agreements, caused consumer confusion, and obscured financial liabilities. Cierra mistt, a tiktoker with 9 million followers, was sued by pepsico for using the name cierra mistt in 2023.
The case was settled out of court, with pepsico paying mistt and changing its soda name to starry. The sierra mist lawsuit involves allegations that pepsico misled consumers by advertising the product as a healthier or more natural drink than it actually was, despite containing artificial ingredients. The lawsuit claims that this false advertising influenced consumer purchasing decisions. Who can participate in the sierra mist lawsuit?

However, the sierra mist lawsuit has created a stir among consumers, leading to several questions and speculations.
This has brought attention to both the pepsi sierra mist lawsuit and its connection to the brand’s replacement. The public reaction to the sierra mist lawsuit and subsequent rebranding to starry was mixed. Loyal fans of sierra mist expressed disappointment over the discontinuation of their favorite drink. On social media, the rebranding was met with curiosity and skepticism, with many questioning the necessity of the change.
In an attempt to shake things up, pepsico is ditching sierra mist. Many are wondering if the corporation is simply rebranding the soda and changing its name for the sake of consumer intrigue. The soda was rebranded and reformulated as mist twst in 2016, reverting back to good ol' sierra mist in 2018. The discontinuation of sierra mist and its replacement with a new soft drink called starry has added to the controversy.

The lack of official statements and transparency from both parties leaves unanswered questions about the nature of the legal action.
The sierra mist lawsuit and the subsequent replacement with starry have undoubtedly caused a stir in the beverage industry and among soda enthusiasts. While the details of the alleged trademark infringement case remain murky, one thing is clear: And yes, in july 2023, cierra mistt shared a tiktok video that talked about sierra mist. The sierra mist lawsuit is a legal dispute between pepsico and tiktok influencer cierra mistt over the alleged infringement of the sierra mist trademark.
Why was sierra mist discontinued? The sierra mist lawsuit is a legal action taken by pepsico against tiktok star cierra mist, alleging trademark infringement. Why was sierra mist discontinued? The rise and fall of sierra mist.

In 1999, pepsico launched sierra mist to challenge sprite’s dominance.
Unfortunately, despite multiple rebranding and recipe adjustments, sierra mist could not establish a solid market presence. It spent several years under sprite’s shadow. Pepsico decided to formally discontinue sierra mist in 2023. Fans of the beverage sierra mist were disappointed when the drink disappeared in january.
The sierra mist lawsuit could lead to big changes in how drinks are advertised. The sierra mist settlement might set a new standard for honesty in ads. This is especially true for how companies talk to customers. The sierra mist lawsuit update hints at possible big money settlements or changes in how they

The ongoing sierra mist lawsuit claims that pepsico’s marketing campaigns suggested that starry was simply a rebrand of sierra mist when, in fact, it was a completely new product.
Many consumers expected starry to taste like sierra mist and were disappointed when they discovered that it had a different flavor profile. The origins of the legal dispute. On january 17, 2025, the federal trade commission (ftc) announced a lawsuit against major food and beverage company pepsi on the basis of illegal price discrimination. The suit alleges that pepsico, inc., distributor of pepsi cola and other soft drinks like crush, mountain dew, and starry — once known as sierra mist — offered advantageous benefits to one large, big box retailer, with no
By 2003 it was available in all us markets. The name is a play on mountain dew: Sierra is the spanish word for mountain range and both mist and dew are composed of water droplets. The lawsuit against sierra mist.
The lawsuit against sierra mist alleges false advertising and misleading claims regarding the product’s ingredients and health benefits.
Then, back in 1999, a new drink called sierra mist was brought to the market, seeing a new flavor of a similar drink, pepsi, that is smoother than sprite. The truth is murky regarding the sierra mist lawsuit, and reaching a solid conclusion isn’t easy. On the one hand, tiktok influencer cierra mistt confidently claimed that pepsico tried to sue her for trademark infringement due to her name’s similarity to their former soda brand, sierra mist. Fans of the beverage sierra mist were disappointed when the drink disappeared in january.
The beverage company described starry as a soda for a generation of irreverent optimist While sierra mist is no longer available, its legacy and the lessons from its legal history continue to influence the beverage industry. A legacy of resilience and adaptation.